About 295 minutes
The Evolution of Old Testament Religion — Story, Setting & Ideas
Sacred Texts
67,628 recorded words. 44 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #45952The Lost Gospel and Its Contents Or, The Author of "Supernatural Religion" Refuted by Himself — Text and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 57,619 words, 4 hr 11 min estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 25.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Supernatural,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 295 minutes
Sacred Texts
67,628 recorded words. 44 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #45952About 103 minutes
Sacred Texts
23,649 recorded words. 148 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #20523About 459 minutes
Sacred Texts
105,530 recorded words. 208 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #2832Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 94 public books, 94 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergSadler's polemic targets the anonymous author of Supernatural Religion, who argued that second-century Fathers quoted earlier gospels now lost. Sadler turns this claim on its head: if those Fathers used earlier sources, those sources contained the same supernatural story as the canonical Gospels—only more explicitly. The book's title, The Lost Gospel and Its Contents, signals this ironic reversal: the supposed 'lost gospel' is actually the familiar one, and its contents confirm the very supernaturalism the critic sought to undermine.
Sadler focuses especially on Justin Martyr, whose writings he examines in detail. He confesses he began with a bias toward the critic's view, expecting Justin to preserve independent apostolic traditions. Instead, he found Justin's knowledge of Jesus and his teaching derived almost entirely from the New Testament as we have it. This discovery, he argues, undercuts the case for earlier, non-supernatural gospels.
Sadler's method is to let the author of Supernatural Religion refute himself. He seizes on the critic's admission that if the Fathers quoted earlier narratives, those accounts contained 'not only substantially, but in detail, the same Gospel which we now possess, and in a form rather more suggestive of the Supernatural.' Sadler treats this as a concession that destroys the critic's own argument. The book's subtitle—The Author of 'Supernatural Religion' Refuted by Himself—announces this strategy. Sadler does not merely defend the Gospels; he claims the critic's evidence backfires, proving the antiquity and consistency of the supernatural story.
This approach allows Sadler to engage the critic's data without conceding his premises. He accepts, for the sake of argument, that Justin and other Fathers used earlier written sources, but then argues that those sources only reinforce the traditional Christian claim. The result is a tightly focused rebuttal that turns the critic's own scholarship against him.
Sadler devotes the bulk of his book to Justin Martyr, a second-century Christian apologist. He acknowledges that Justin, as a Palestinian native living close to the apostolic age, might have preserved independent traditions. But after close examination, Sadler concludes that Justin 'had no knowledge of our Lord and of His teaching worth speaking of, except what he might be fairly assumed to have derived from our present New Testament.' This is a striking admission from a defender of orthodoxy: Justin is not an independent witness but a dependent one.
Sadler supports this with textual analysis, though the excerpts show only his general conclusion. He notes that he has given the original Greek in cases of doubt, indicating careful philological work. The effect is to undercut the critic's claim that Justin used a lost gospel: if Justin's quotations match the canonical Gospels, there is no need to posit a lost source. Sadler's disappointment at finding Justin less original than expected becomes evidence for the reliability of the received text.
Sadler addresses the objection that the Fourth Gospel's Logos theology is too philosophical for a Galilean fisherman. He argues that John could have acquired the concept through contact with Alexandrian Jews, who used the Aramaic term Meymera (Word) in their Targums. A few hours' conversation with an Alexandrian Jew, Sadler claims, would have sufficed to explain the Logos idea. He even suggests John might have met Philo himself, given the proximity of Jerusalem and Alexandria.
This argument is notable for its naturalistic explanation of John's theology—Sadler calls it a 'humanly speaking' account—while still affirming the Holy Spirit's inspiration. He insists the Spirit's role is shown in the 'power and explicitness' of John's identification of the Logos with Christ. The passage reveals Sadler's willingness to engage critical arguments on their own terms, using historical and linguistic evidence to defend traditional authorship and dating.
Readers should note that Sadler writes as a parish priest, not a professional scholar, and his tone is combative. The book presupposes familiarity with the Supernatural Religion controversy and with patristic sources. Those new to the debate may find the argument dense, but the central irony—that an attack on the Gospels ends up confirming their antiquity—is clearly stated. Sadler's focus on Justin Martyr and the Logos provides concrete case studies for evaluating the critic's claims.
Reading this, I remembered sitting with my grandfather’s old copy of The Golden Bough, turning pages about dying gods. Sadler’s quiet insistence that the Gospel’s roots hold fast feels like that same patient archaeology—finding buried patterns that don’t collapse but cohere. There’s comfort in watching a careful mind trace threads back to something enduring, not dissolving. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 04 of 12) — Key Ideas to Explore once gave me that stillness, too.
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.