About 55 minutes
Welsh Nationality, and How Alone It is to Be Saved: A Sermon — Themes and Context
Theology
12,571 recorded words. 1 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #60592Islam — Text and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 12,678 words, 56 min estimated reading time, and 15 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 21.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Islam,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 55 minutes
Theology
12,571 recorded words. 1 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #60592About 57 minutes
Theology
13,087 recorded words. 1 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #67064About 54 minutes
Theology
12,253 recorded words. 2 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #25792Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 94 public books, 94 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergAnnie H. Small opens her 1905 study Islam with a stark claim: mutual understanding between Christianity and Islam is more difficult than between any two living faiths. The preface immediately establishes a dual critique—of Islam’s limited exposure to “the least true, the least pure” Christianity, and of Christians’ “undefined shrinking” from sympathy. Small’s voice is urgent and moral, calling for study “if possible with sympathy” so that the inevitable confrontation between the faiths may be “worthily and Christianly” fought. The book is not primarily a study of Islam, she insists, but a guide for Christian, especially missionary, thought. This framing shapes every subsequent section, as Small moves between doctrinal comparison and historical reflection, always with an eye to the practical responsibilities of her Christian audience.
Small’s preface is remarkable for its willingness to assign blame to her own tradition. She writes that Christians tend to turn from points of contact with Islam, repelled by the prophet, the religion, the moral code, and the history. Yet she immediately pivots: Islam cannot be ignored, and Christian nations have stood helpless while fellow-Christians were “cruelly and wickedly entreated.” The language is direct and unsparing. Small does not excuse Muslim rule, but she insists that the only Christianity Islam officially knows is “the least true, the least pure.” This is not a generic call for tolerance; it is a specific indictment of the church’s failure to present a worthy witness. The preface thus sets up a tension that runs through the book: a clear-eyed acknowledgment of Islam’s power and darkness, paired with a conviction that Christians must first examine their own inadequacies before engaging in battle.
In her discussion of the Quran’s references to Jesus, Small makes a pointed historical argument. She notes that in Muhammad’s time there was no Arabic version of the Bible; the Prophet depended on Jews and Christians for information. The “terrible blunder of his life” was forming conclusions on “very insufficient knowledge.” But Small immediately turns the lens back on the church: “Enough has not been made of the responsibility of the church which had no better tales to tell.” She observes that the Quran denies Jesus’ divinity yet grants him titles “little short of Divine”—Messiah, Word of Truth, a man unstained by sin. The Jesus of the Quran, Small argues, is one Muhammad never claimed for himself. Yet Muhammad supersedes Jesus. This paradox, she implies, stems from the inadequate Christianity presented to the seeker. The analysis is tightly focused on textual evidence and historical circumstance, avoiding broad claims about the Quran as a whole.
Small devotes particular attention to the Quran’s denial of Jesus’ crucifixion. She quotes the passage: “They slew Him not, neither crucified Him, but He was represented by one in His likeness.” She reports that Muhammad so hated the sign of the cross that any object bearing its mark was destroyed. For Small, the horror of the thought that Jesus should die “the abhorred death” seems to be the Quran’s own argument against its occurrence. She then draws a theological conclusion: what the cross symbolizes—God’s approach to sinful man in mercy and love—is “entirely lacking” in the Quran. There is no assurance of salvation, only the Prophet’s word. Small calls this “a tragic story,” and again places responsibility on Christian writers who have cast blame largely upon Muhammad. The section is careful not to overreach: she does not claim to know the full Quranic view, but limits her inference to what the quoted passages and historical context allow.
Small’s Islam is best read as a document of its time—a missionary’s attempt to understand a rival faith while holding fast to her own convictions. The book’s value lies not in its doctrinal conclusions but in its willingness to turn criticism inward. Readers should note the preface’s framing: this is a study of Christian attitudes as much as of Islam. The excerpts show a writer who names Christian failures with unusual candor, even as she maintains the superiority of her own tradition. For those interested in the history of interfaith encounter, Small’s voice offers a specific, early-twentieth-century example of how a sympathetic yet committed Christian scholar approached the challenge of Islam.
I found myself thinking, after setting down Small's patient, self-questioning preface, how rarely we let old books correct us so gently. Her careful parsing of another faith’s words reminded me of an older voice, one that also reached across a divide to re-imagine familiar songs. Therefore, I turned to The Psalms of David Imitated in the Language of the New Testament and Applied to the Christian State and Worship — Key Ideas to Explore, hearing that same quiet humility seeking a way to speak truthfully, yet new.
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.