Frederic Rowland Marvin opens his sermon with a bold claim: "the Bible honored woman when every other book was blind to the true dignity of her character." This declarative sentence sets the tone for a work that seeks to reclaim scriptural authority for women's public and spiritual roles. The sermon's structure moves from biblical examples to secular tributes—John Stuart Mill's dedication to his wife, Auguste Comte's veneration of Clotilde de Vaux, and the Taj Mahal as a monument to marital love—weaving a tapestry of evidence that argues for woman's influence in art, literature, and religion. Frances Power Cobbe's introduction frames the sermon as a corrective to ecclesiastical traditions that have "denied to women the honors and responsibilities of sacred offices."
Rhetorical Strategy: From Scripture to Secular Tribute
Marvin's argument proceeds not by systematic theology but by accumulation of resonant examples. He moves from biblical figures—Miriam, Deborah, Judith, Esther—to modern intellectuals and monuments. The shift is deliberate: by placing Mill's tribute to his wife alongside the Taj Mahal, Marvin suggests that women's influence transcends religious boundaries. The sermon's diction is elevated, with phrases like "the eternal womanly Draws us upward and onward" (quoting Goethe) and references to "the most exquisite building on the globe." This rhetorical choice aligns women's influence with beauty, spirituality, and moral elevation, rather than with political or economic arguments. The effect is to create a sense of universal, almost inevitable, recognition of women's power.
The Use of Exemplary Women: Biblical and Beyond
Marvin draws on a curated list of exemplary women: the biblical heroines, but also Lady Byron, Mrs. Kemble, and Frances Power Cobbe herself. The inclusion of Cobbe's anecdote about Mrs. Kemble's desire to say "Be good" to her audience serves as a microcosm of the sermon's thesis: women's natural inclination is toward moral and religious instruction. Marvin does not argue for women's ordination directly; instead, he presents women as already exercising spiritual authority through influence. The examples are carefully chosen to avoid controversy—Mill's wife, Comte's muses, and the Mogul empress are all figures who inspired great works, not women who sought public office. This selective evidence shapes the sermon's moderate tone.
Diction and the Construction of Womanhood
Marvin's language consistently associates women with qualities like "purity," "sweetness," "spiritual matters," and "long after the infinite" (citing Renan). The phrase "consecrated womanhood" itself implies a sacred, set-apart status. In describing the Taj Mahal, he quotes Heber's "dream in marble" and emphasizes the "love a noble and beautiful woman inspired." The diction avoids direct political claims; instead, it frames women's power as inspirational and moral. This lexical choice reflects a strategic moderation: Marvin advocates for women's expanded roles but within a framework of traditional femininity. The sermon's voice is that of a pastor seeking to persuade, not a polemicist demanding change.
The Role of the Introduction: Cobbe's Framing
Frances Power Cobbe's introduction, written in 1903, provides a crucial lens. She praises the sermon as "like a breadth of fresh air" and notes that it "clearly shows" the Old Testament's honor of women. Cobbe, a prominent feminist and writer, adds her own authority to Marvin's argument. She references her essay "The Fitness of Women for the Ministry of Religion" and includes a footnote from Mrs. Kemble's autobiography. Her introduction also subtly critiques the church's history: "patristic and monastic sources" are blamed for diminishing women's status. By aligning herself with Marvin, Cobbe extends the sermon's reach beyond its original congregation, framing it as a corrective to centuries of ecclesiastical tradition.
Readers approaching this sermon should attend to the interplay between its biblical foundation and its eclectic use of secular monuments and intellectual figures. Marvin's rhetorical choices—the accumulation of examples, the elevated diction, the avoidance of direct political demands—reveal a careful strategy to persuade a conservative audience. The sermon is best read as a document of its time, reflecting both the limits and the possibilities of progressive religious thought at the turn of the twentieth century.
There’s something touching about how Marvin, arguing for women’s spiritual weight, reaches back to scripture and history so carefully—as if he half-knows the congregation needs convincing of what should be plain. It reminds me of another quiet funeral sermon, one that lingers on a single life’s worth, Two Sermons Preached in the Parish Church of Nonington, Kent, January 17, 1864 being the Sunday following the Funeral of John Pemberton Plumptre, Esq. — A Closer Reading. Both feel like relics of an age that took its own arguments seriously.